Tag Archives: Horse

The Natural History of Humans and Sea Shells

In an earlier post, Archaeology: Human Natural History, I wrote about some of the wonderfully rich history that can be gleaned from a walk along the bed of the River Thames at low tide. I delighted in the pottery and pipe-bowls, as I do still.

But today, on a gloriously sunny, still and almost warm day with the tide right out, and the Egyptian Geese honking stridently and flying about — three pairs, and an equally loud loner — my walk along the river produced unexpected and equally delightful results.

Along with a nice potshard of Maling ware (it says “S”  “MAL” and half an “H”) , I found an enormous toe-bone of a horse, 95 mm long. It fits snugly in my hand; it’s roughly the size and shape of a pistol grip, and as heavy.  It was a proximal phalanx – the sequence is distal (hoof bone) – medial – proximal as you go up the leg. Now, today, one can barely imagine throwing a horse bone into a river. But in the days before public health officers and EU safety regulations, it was nothing strange. For a start, London was full of horses, both fine beasts for gentlemen to ride, or to pull their carriages; and small, tired, sometimes broken-down nags that pulled the rag-and-bone man’s recycling cart, and everything in between. For another thing, people ate horsemeat, as they do today (in decreasing amounts) all across the continent of Europe. If you were poor in Victorian London, horse stew must have been a rich, warm, nutritious and welcome dish: even if the horse had died of old age.

Water-worn wooden steps
Water-worn wooden steps

In the soft light, a set of old wooden steps, the timbers worn and scoured by thousands of tides carrying currents of mud, sand, shell and even shingle, were quite beautiful in their natural simplicity, revealing the structure and fibres of the once-thick and rectangular treads.

On the sand a little way further were scatters of Oysters and Cockles, with some other kinds of clam for good measure.

Cockleshells, Oystershells
Cockleshells, Oystershells

Now at first sight there is nothing very surprising about finding shells in a tidal river: sea shells, sea water. But these are fully marine species: they need salt. And are they not suspiciously fresh? Indeed, they are still articulated. Someone, having enjoyed an excellent seafood dinner, has still, this year, happily thrown out their shells onto the river bed, just as their ancestors did before them through the centuries. The fresh pottery fragments indicate that broken cups, plates (and indeed also pub glasses and bottles) similarly continue to find their way into the the river’s archaeology, just as they have for centuries, if not millennia. The river of life flows on; man’s natural history, his interaction with wild-caught or farmed animals (from horses to horse mussels, perhaps) leaves behind its small detritus of bone and shell, from one generation to the next.

What will the archaeologists of 2,000 years hence make of our generation, our few varves in some long sequence of layers of lake-mud? It is a curious reflection. In the sixties we hoped that it wouldn’t be a plutonium-iridium layer for them to puzzle over. Let’s again hope that it won’t be that.

Old English Love of Nature

Today, since I was passing by, I dropped in to the British Museum’s new gallery celebrating Anglo-Saxon (or, if you prefer, Old English) culture and art. To anyone who thinks Saxon just means crude and rough, dull Dark Ages stuff, think again. The new gallery, Room 41 (upstairs, almost above the main entrance) is resplendent with finely-crafted treasures. The most famous among them are from the Sutton Hoo ship burial of some real-life Beowulf-like leader. And one of the finest of the pieces from that collection is the carved gilt helmet.

Sutton Hoo Helmet, with protective animals
Restoration of Sutton Hoo Helmet, with protective animals

At first glance, the carvings on the helmet seem to be restricted to the panels, which show warriors with swords, on foot or on horseback, along with elaborate ‘Celtic’ patterns of knotwork. That would be fine enough, but there is more. The nose and eyebrow guards of the helmet, together with the moustache, form a large winged animal with angry red inset garnets for its eyes, fiery red rectangular garnets bordering its wings. It touches nose-to-nose with a snake or dragon – the old word for both was ‘worm’ – that stretches as a crest over the top of the helmet. The worm’s eyes too are of garnets. And even better, the ends of the eyebrow/wings are shining gold boar’s heads, just like the boar-headed helmet mentioned in the Beowulf poem.

So this marvellous helmet, this treasure almost beyond price (both now and when it was a prince’s armour and emblem), is adorned, no, actually made of no less than three powerful beasts, each perhaps with almost magical powers: flight, fire, and ferocity, we might say. It isn’t hard to imagine that these were talismanic animals, symbols of warrior bravery, strength and victory in battle. Were they spirit guides, protective animals chosen or sent to guard the wearer from harm? I should think so.

So, what was the Old English feeling towards animals? Certainly they were taken for food; but on the evidence of this splendid piece of royal armour, they were surely also admired for their strength, speed, and courage. Can we describe that as love of nature? Of course we can.

One final question: how long have the English loved nature? We may guess the date: since the foundation of our kingdom by Hengist and Horsa in c. 550 AD, it seems. Both of our founder-kings (they ruled together) had animal names: Hengist means stallion, while Horsa (you guessed it) means horse. Not too hard to imagine which fine strong proud animal their parents specially admired, then.